How to Structure a Robust Qualitative Research Project?

Before any data are collected or analyzed, every qualitative research project goes through a crucial structuring phase: the project proposal. Whether developed for a master’s thesis, an academic funding application (such as an ANR grant), or an ethics review, this stage requires researchers to formalize, structure, and justify the entire research design.

Defining a topic alone is not sufficient. The challenge lies in articulating the research question, scientific objectives, theoretical framework, methodology, target population, analytical protocol, ethical considerations and operational planning. In other words, it means transforming an intellectual intention into a project that is feasible, coherent, and scientifically credible.

This phase demands deep reflection and the ability to organize all components of the project into a consistent and transparent whole. Clear structuring is also essential to convince key stakeholders, such as supervisors, ethics committees, or funding bodies, of the project’s rigor and relevance.

In this article, we outline the key elements of this preparatory phase, along with methodological best practices and practical tools that can support its effective implementation.

Why Structuring Your Research Project Is a Fundamental Step?

Qualitative research is valued for its interpretive richness, flexibility, and capacity to explore complex phenomena. However, this methodological openness does not eliminate the need for rigorous structuring at the outset, quite the opposite. The more uncertain or exploratory the field, the more a clear framework is required to ensure coherence, feasibility, and scientific credibility.

From Trial and Error to Methodological Coherence

In many qualitative studies, lack of initial structure leads to well-known pitfalls:

• An overly broad or poorly defined fieldwork scope;
• Disorganized or incomplete data collection;
• Methodological shifts that occur without explicit justification;
• A final report that is difficult to articulate or synthesize.

Structuring a project from the outset does not mean freezing its content. Rather, it means defining a coherent scope by clarifying key questions: What are we trying to understand? With whom? Using which methods? According to what timeline? With which tools?

Such clarity is essential, especially when a project must be reviewed by a research committee or submitted for funding approval.

An Epistemological Stance That Shapes the Entire Structure

The structure of a qualitative project also depends on the epistemological stance adopted, as it shapes the way the research question is framed, the fieldwork is chosen, and the data are interpreted.

Depending on the chosen orientation (phenomenological, interactionist, constructivist, ethnographic, critical,or another qualitative tradition), emphasis will be placed on different dimensions:

• Understanding subjective lived experiences;
• Analyzing social dynamics;
• Co-constructing meaning with participants;
• Observing a group, organisation, or culture;
• Uncovering power relations and structural inequalities.

Stating this stance explicitly from the beginning enhances the overall coherence and scientific legitimacy of the project.

What a Solid Structure Enables from the Outset

A well-structured preparation phase allows you to:

• Clearly articulate the logic of the project, from research problem to intended analysis;
• Justify your methodological choices to an evaluator, supervisor, or ethics committee;
• Anticipate logistical, ethical, or regulatory constraints (such as GDPR complicance);
• Organize collaborative work when multiple actors are involved (researchers, students, institutional partners…);
• Establish strong scientific traceability through version control, methodological logs, and clearly documented protocols.

In qualitative research, to structure is not to standardize. It means establishing a flexible yet robust framework that will serve as the backbone for all subsequent stages of the research process.

Key Components of a Qualitative Research Project

A well-structured qualitative project relies on a set of interdependent components that must be designed together: research problem, objectives, population, methodology, corpus, organization, and planning. It is the coherence of this whole that ensures both the scientific robustness and the feasibility of the project.

The Research Question as a Central Anchor

Every qualitative research design begins with a clear research question that defines the scope of the inquiry and guides the methodological decisions. It should be:

• Open-ended, to encourage exploration and interpretation;
• Contextualized, grounded in a theoretical or empirical framework;
• Aligned with the stated scientific objectives;
• Formulated around the practices, representations, or lived experiences of the people being studied.

The research question is what guides the fieldwork selection, data collection methods, corpus construction, and ultimately, the analytical logic of the study.

Research Objectives: Direction and Scope

A qualitative research project must clearly articulate:

• A primary objective, which directly responds to the central research question;
• Secondary objectives, which define the key areas of analysis or dimensions to be explored.

Example:

• Primary objective: To understand informal digital practices among secondary school teachers.
• Secondary objectives: To identify adoption factors, analyze expressed forms of resistance, and assess the effects on teachers’ relationship to knowledge.

These objectives must be realistic, compatible with available resources, and coherent with the chosen methodological approach.

Defining the Field, Participants, and Access Conditions

Project feasibility depends on a clear delineation of the research field:

• Target population: participant profiles, inclusion criteria, estimated sample size;
• Study setting: school environment, organization, association, or other relevant context;
• Access conditions: required authorizations, institutional constraints, and participant availability.

This level of precision is essential for anticipating ethical considerations, including informed consent, confidentiality, and compliance with applicable regulations such as the GDPR.

The Preliminary Theoretical Framework: A Foundation, Not a Cage

Even within an inductive qualitative approach, it is essential to situate the research within an existing body of knowledge. This typically involves:

• Reviewing prior work in the field;
• Identifying relevant concepts or existing theoretical models;
• Potentially developing provisional analytical frameworks.

The goal is not to lock the research into a rigid framework, but to provide a solid theoretical foundation, often required in funding applications or scientific protocols.

Methods and Tools for Effectively Organizing a Qualitative Research Project

Structuring a qualitative research project also means organizing the workload, formalizing methodological choices, and anticipating how empirical materials will be managed. This organization relies on a combination of conceptual tools (notes, diagrams, matrices) and methodological supports that ensure rigor, traceability, and flexibility throughout the research process.

The Research Journal as a Structuring Backbone

The research journal is one of the most important tools for ensuring project coherence. It allows you to record:

• The evolution of the research question;
• Methodological uncertainties, adjustments, or shifts in direction;
• Decisions made at each step of the preparatory phase.

Whether maintained in a paper notebook or a digital file, the research journal provides an essential reflexive record. In many academic contexts, such documentation is explicitly required in protocols submitted to ethics committees or supervisory bodies.

Mind Maps, Tables, and Planning Diagrams

Visual tools are particularly valuable during the project design phase. Mind maps and planning diagrams help to:

• Clearly articulate the research problem, key concepts, and variables;
• Model the relationships between objects of study, hypotheses, and methodological choices;
• Structure reasoning in a concise and communicable format (for example, as appendices in a project submission).

These visual representations also serve as argumentation tools, making the project more intelligible to reviewers, evaluators, or scientific committees.

Planning to Ensure Feasibility

Detailed planning is another essential dimension of project structuring. It involves:

• Establish realistic timelines: literature review, authorization processes, preparation of interview guides, etc.;
• Prioritise tasks and anticipate logistical constraints;
• Identify critical points: participant access, institutional authorizations, ethical requirements.

Good planning ensures project feasibility and enables better time management, especially in academic settings where deadlines are often strict.

Anticipating the Project Design Before Data Collection

It is strongly recommended to outline the project structure before data collection begins. This anticipatory work may include:

• Preliminary organization of the data corpus by source type (interviews, documents, observations);
• Development of exploratory categories or hypothetical codes to test the relevance of the future analytical framework;
• Drafting protocol memos to document methodological choices and their justification.

This step contributes to presenting a credible and realistic research design, which is frequently required in project proposals or funding applications.

Strengthening Project Submissions with Evaluation Frameworks

Before submitting a project to a supervisor, ethics committee, or funding body, it can be useful to assess it using well-established evaluation frameworks. These serve as methodological quality checks and help anticipate potential critiques:

• FINER (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant) and SPICE (Setting, Perspective, Interest, Comparison, Evaluation) are not only useful for formulating research questions. They also help assess feasibility, relevance, and ethical soundness at the project level.
• SRQR (Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research) and COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) are international checklists used to evaluate the clarity of the research question, the justification of methodological choices, the description of the field, and the robustness of ethical safeguards.

Relying on these frameworks from the outset increases the likelihood of swift approval and strengthens the scientific credibility of the research protocol.

Our Solutions for Structuring Your Research Project

To effectively structure your qualitative research project from the preparatory phase onward, we have selected complementary software solutions that support each step of the process. These tools help you plan your research design, organize and manage your sources, anticipate analytical strategies, and document every methodological decision with rigor and transparency.

Together, Citavi and NVivo lay the foundation for a solid research protocol and a well-prepared analysis. These complementary tools integrate the Lumivero AI Assistant, which streamlines the creation of summaries by suggesting relevant concepts and proposing codes to support your methodological decisions.

Conclusion: Building a Well-Structured Project on Solid Foundations

Structuring a qualitative research project is not just a formality, it is a decisive step in ensuring the scientific coherence, feasibility, and credibility of a study. Clearly defining the research question, setting realistic objectives, outlining the project scope, and anticipating ethical constraints are all key elements that strengthen the foundation of any research protocol, whether for a thesis or a funded project.

This preparatory phase requires deep and methodical reflection, which can be supported by tools that help organize ideas, document methodological choices, and plan the research process. When used thoughtfully, these specialized software solutions enhance the clarity of the project and make it easier to defend before a scientific committee or academic authority.

A well-prepared project leaves less room for unforeseen difficulties and provides a solid framework for the subsequent stages of qualitative research, particularly data collection and analysis. In this sense, rigorous structuring at the outset is a key condition for conducting qualitative research on sound and sustainable foundations.

Taking Your Qualitative Research Projects Further

Because a well-structured project is the foundation of credible and defensible qualitative research, RITME supports researchers with a tailored offering designed to help organize, plan, and strengthen research protocols:

• Powerful software solutions to support your qualitative research workflow, such as NVivo, the industry-leading tool for qualitative data analysis.;
• Software training sessions led by expert researchers, to help you master every feature and enhance your analysis skills.;
• Research methodology training, designed to deepen and structure your qualitative research practices.

Our offer also includes EFFISCIANCE, a strategic support program built around generative AI, designed to help you integrate artificial intelligence into your scientific workflows. The program features a dedicated module on AI applied to qualitative analysis, as well astailored guidance to define and deploy AI agents, that enhance performance, streamline workflows, and generate more relevant insights.

---

Need Support Framing Your Project?
Our team is here to guide you from choosing the right tools to integrating AI into your research environment.

Contact us to get started!